It makes God disingenuous or worse.
The Nonsense of God having 2 wills
- Thread starter civic
- Start date
civic
Well-known member
Worse
Agreed
The Rogue Tomato
Well-known member
Maybe you should reconsider what "all" means given the proper context.
Maybe you should reconsider your comment
How many times did God state to love Israel
Calvinism denies any meaningful reflection of that love
civic
Well-known member
100’s
Revealed will Why must you die I have no please at the death of the wicked
Secret will proposed by Calvinists God unconditionally reprobated them for his own good pleasure
civic
Well-known member
If Calvinism is true and by Gods predetermined will it make one wonder if anyone could if been saved before tulip was invented. Also everyone prior to the reformation never believed in PSA so no one understood the atonement until it was invented a few hundred years ago.
Calvinists say those who reject PSA reject the gospel just like they say with tulip
PSA was designed around the belief atonement is a commercial transaction
It was also designed in support of Calvinism
civic
Well-known member
Exactly
That's why I find it strange when non-Calvinist support it.Exactly
Rockson
Well-known member
Maybe a good question for Calvinists. Let's say Eze 33:11 didn't say, "I have no pleasure at the death of the wicked" but it actually said, "I have unconditionally reprobated the wicked for death and punishment" and we came along and said, No, no, no.....God has a secret will which actually is he has no pleasure at the death the the wicked" what could we expect they'd say?
I think it's safe to say we KNOW what they'd say, They'd say you're getting off the clearly stated, statement by God that he's unconditionally reprobated the wicked for death" and they'd be telling us how dare we change the straightforward word. Thing is though....THEY don't have the scripture on their side.....it's the non Calvinist which does! Think I'll stay with the scripture.
You would not make a good Calvinist then
