praise_yeshua
Active Member
Perspective.
As a means of "setting the table" for the discussion.....
The "artist" paints a picture that often generates various interpretations of the intent of the artist. Without direct access to the artist that actually "painted/constructed" the image, the "beholder" is often left to ascertain that intent themselves. We can examine the work of the artist itself for evidence whereby to establish a properly constructed evaluation of the "intent" of the artist. What we know about the artist "himself/herself" can also assist in our "evaluation".
However, there is only one "person" that can know exactly what is intended. The artist. The more complex the "picture/painting", the more difficult the task to gain perspective.
I heard a man many years ago say that "when God wanted to create a beautiful picture.... He "paints" it in the sky". I have to say I agree but I believe the man's perspective is a little too narrow. I would like to change his statement a little.
I believe when God desired to create a beautiful "image", He created the "new creature" in Jesus Christ. That image reflected our own experiences. It caused us to deal with our reflections. How we judge such is entirely related to our own perspective. As such, we are free to live in accordance with our own perspective. Which reflects our personal views of God. Which either condemns us or positions us for acceptance from God.
I've started this thread to really draw out various perspectives from one another. I know what I want to say but it will be meaningless to many without interaction with you. Many people love to "hear themselves talk". That is not my goal here. My goal to construct a meaningful exchange wherein we can deal with an essential facet of our existence gifted by God.
Just what do you "think"?
As a means of "setting the table" for the discussion.....
The "artist" paints a picture that often generates various interpretations of the intent of the artist. Without direct access to the artist that actually "painted/constructed" the image, the "beholder" is often left to ascertain that intent themselves. We can examine the work of the artist itself for evidence whereby to establish a properly constructed evaluation of the "intent" of the artist. What we know about the artist "himself/herself" can also assist in our "evaluation".
However, there is only one "person" that can know exactly what is intended. The artist. The more complex the "picture/painting", the more difficult the task to gain perspective.
I heard a man many years ago say that "when God wanted to create a beautiful picture.... He "paints" it in the sky". I have to say I agree but I believe the man's perspective is a little too narrow. I would like to change his statement a little.
I believe when God desired to create a beautiful "image", He created the "new creature" in Jesus Christ. That image reflected our own experiences. It caused us to deal with our reflections. How we judge such is entirely related to our own perspective. As such, we are free to live in accordance with our own perspective. Which reflects our personal views of God. Which either condemns us or positions us for acceptance from God.
I've started this thread to really draw out various perspectives from one another. I know what I want to say but it will be meaningless to many without interaction with you. Many people love to "hear themselves talk". That is not my goal here. My goal to construct a meaningful exchange wherein we can deal with an essential facet of our existence gifted by God.
Just what do you "think"?
Last edited: