John's EGO EIMI Sayings Revisited

Johann

Well-known member
JOHN’S EGO EIMI SAYINGS REVISITED
A careful examination of the Greek version of the Hebrew Bible, typically known as the Septuagint (LXX), with that of John’s Gospel will conclusively prove that Jesus’ “I AM” statements are clearly intended to identify him as the human incarnation of YHWH God (cf. John 1:1-18). The way in which John has communicated Christ’s words into the Greek tongue makes it obvious that the Apostle is making a direct connection with the “I AM” sayings of YHWH in the Hebrew Bible, specifically the book of Isaiah.

In the following chart, I cite from the LXX version of Isaiah in order to help readers see how Jesus’ “I AM” statements deliberately echo that of YHWH’s.


“Therefore shall my people know my name in that day for I am he, the one who is speaking to you (ego eimi autos ho lalon).” Isaiah 52:6 LXX

“All the nations are gathered together, and princes shall be gathered out of them: who will declare (anangelei) these things? or who will declare (anangelei) to you things from the beginning? Let them bring forth their witnesses (martyras), and be justified; and let them hear, and declare the truth. Be my witnesses (martyres); and I too am a witness (martyrs), says the Lord God, and the servant whom I have chosen (exelexamen)so that you may know, and believe, and understand that I am he (hina… gnote pisteusete… hoti ego eimi): before me there came to be (egeneto) no other god, nor shall there be any after me. I am God, and besides me there is none who saves. I declared (anengeila) and saved; I reproached, and there was no stranger among you: You are my witnesses; I too am a witness, says the Lord God.” Isaiah 43:9-12
“The woman said to him, ‘I know that Messiah is coming’ (who is called Christ). ‘When he comes, he will proclaim (anangelei) all things to us.’ Jesus said to her, ‘I am he, the one who is speaking to you (ego eimi autos ho lalon).’” John 4:25-27 New Revised Standard Version Updated Edition (NRSVUE)


“Many Samaritans from that city believed in him because of the woman’s testimony, ‘He told me everything I have ever done.’ So when the Samaritans came to him, they asked him to stay with them, and he stayed there two days. And many more believed because of his word. They said to the woman, ‘It is no longer because of what you said that we believe, for we have heard for ourselves, and we know that this is truly the Savior of the world.’” John 4:39-42 NRSVUE

“In your law it is written that the testimony of two witnesses is valid. I am (ego eimi) the one testifying (martyron) about myself, and the Father who sent me testifies (martyrei) on my behalf.” John 8:17-18

“He said to them, ‘You are from below, I am from above; you are from this world, I am not from this world. I told you that you would die in your sins, for you will die in your sins unless you believe that I am he (pisteusete hoti ego eimi).’” John 8:23-24 NRSVUE

“So Jesus said, ‘When you have lifted up the Son of Man, then you will realize that I am he (gnosesthe hoti ego eimi) and that I do nothing on my own, but I speak these things as the Father instructed me. And the one who sent me is with me; he has not left me alone, for I always do what is pleasing to him.’” John 8:28-29 NRSVUE

“‘Your ancestor Abraham rejoiced that he would see my day; he saw it and was glad.’ Then the Jews said to him, ‘You are not yet fifty years old, and have you seen Abraham?’ Jesus said to them, “Very truly, I tell you, before Abraham came to be (genesthai), I AM (ego eimi).’ So they picked up stones to throw at him, but Jesus hid himself and went out of the temple.” John 8:56-59

“Jesus, knowing that the Father had given all things into his hands and that he had come from God and was going to God (pros ton theon)… ‘I am not speaking of all of you; I know whom I have chosen (exelexamen). But it is to fulfill the scripture, “The one who ate my bread has lifted his heel against me.” I tell you this now, before it occurs, so that when it comes to be you may believe that I am he (hina hotan genētai pisteusete hoti ego eimi).’” John 13:3, 18-19

What makes the septuagintal rendering of Isa. 43:10 rather intriguing is that the servant is depicted as being distinct from both YHWH and the nation of Israel, whereas in the Hebrew version the servant and Israel are equated:

“You are my witnesses, says the LORD, and my servant whom I have chosen, so that you may know and believe me and understand that I am he. Before me no god was formed, nor shall there be any after me.” NRSVUE

“Be my witnesses; and I too am a witness, says the Lord God, AND the servant whom I have chosen so that you may know, and believe, and understand that I am he.” LXX

Notice how the LXX gives the impression that the servant whom YHWH has chosen is personally distinct from the Israel that is summoned to also bear witness to YHWH being the only God that exists.

This comports with the fact that in Isaiah there are two servants, both of whom are called Israel, namely, the nation and the specific individual whom the NT and later Jewish tradition identifies as Messiah (Cf. Isa. 42:1-7; 49:1-10; 50:4-6; 52:13-15; Matt. 8:14-17; 12:17-21; Luke 22:37; Acts 8:30-35; 1 Peter 2:21-25).

Jesus’ ego eimi statements in John 13:19 is also significant in light of its context where John tells us that the Son “had come from God and was going to God (pros ton theon).”

These words deliberately the Prologue where Jesus is identified as the eternal Word who was with God (pros ton theon) from before the creation of all things:

“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God (pros ton theon), and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God (pros ton theon). All things came into being through him, and without him not one thing came into being. What has come into being in him was life, and the life was the light of all people… The true light, which enlightens everyone, was coming into the world. He was in the world, and the world came into being through him, yet the world did not know him… And the Word became flesh and lived among us, and we have seen his glory, the glory as of a father’s only son, full of grace and truth.” John 1:1-4, 9-10, 14

Elsewhere in John, Christ plainly speaks of his coming down from the Father to enter into the world, and of his leaving the world to go back to the Father:

“‘I have said these things to you in figures of speech. The hour is coming when I will no longer speak to you in figures but will tell you plainly of the Father. On that day you will ask in my name. I do not say to you that I will ask the Father on your behalf, for the Father himself loves you because you have loved me and have believed that I came from God. I came from the Father and have come into the world; again, I am leaving the world and am going to the Father (pros ton patera).’ His disciples said, ‘Yes, now you are speaking plainly, not in any figure of speech! Now we know that you know all things and do not need to have anyone question you; by this we believe that you came from God.’ Jesus answered them, ‘Do you now believe?’” John 16:25-31 NRSVUE

Note, once again, John’s use of the preposition pros, which again points us to Jesus being the divine, uncreated Word who was pros (“with”) God from before the creation.

In fact, the Lord makes this very same point in his prayer to the Father:

“So now, Father, glorify me in your own presence with the glory that I had in your presence before the world existed… for the words that you gave to me I have given to them, and they have received them and know in truth that I came from you, and they have believed that you sent me… Father, I desire that those also, whom you have given me, may be with me where I am, to see my glory, which you have given me because you loved me before the foundation of the world.” John 17:5, 8, 24 NRSVUE

Here, Jesus affirms that he personally existed alongside the Father where they both shared the same glory from before the creation the world. This is why he could say that he had come forth from the Father and was now returning back to the glory that he had shared alongside of him.

Nor is this the only time where Christ spoke of his prehuman, heavenly existence with the Father:

“No one has ascended into heaven except the one who descended from heaven, the Son of Man.” John 3:13 NRSVUE

“‘for I have come down from heaven not to do my own will but the will of him who sent me. And this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me but raise it up on the last day. This is indeed the will of my Father, that all who see the Son and believe in him may have eternal life, and I will raise them up on the last day.’ Then the Jews began to complain about him because he said, ‘I am the bread that came down from heaven.’ They were saying, ‘Is not this Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? How can he now say, “I have come down from heaven”?’” John 6:38-42 NRSVUE

“Then what if you were to see the Son of Man ascending to where he was before?” John 6:62 NRSVUE

“Jesus said to them, ‘If God were your Father, you would love me, for I came from God, and now I am here. I did not come on my own, but he sent me.’” John 8:42 NRSVUE

Clearly, then, Jesus’ ego eimi saying in John 13:19 means much more than “I am the Messiah who was foretold by the prophets.” The context shows that Christ is deliberately echoing the “I AM” sayings of YHWH found throughout Isaiah, specifically in Isa. 43:10, in order to make it known to his disciples that they were beholding the God of Israel himself in human flesh.

J.
 
I have 3 questions: concerning this thesis:

  1. If Jesus was the YHWH of the Tanakh, where does the Father appear in the Tanakh?
  2. If Jesus was the YHWH of the Tanakh, who was the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob?
  3. If Jesus was the YHWH of the Tanakh, who were the Israelites expected to understand by "The Father"?
 
  1. If Jesus was the YHWH of the Tanakh, where does the Father appear in the Tanakh?
  2. If Jesus was the YHWH of the Tanakh, who was the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob?
  3. If Jesus was the YHWH of the Tanakh, who were the Israelites expected to understand by "The Father"?
There is a significant amount of misinformation and disinformation circulating online, and writings from ancient rabbis about Jesus-let alone the Trinity-are extremely limited. It’s disheartening to see the ongoing debate between Unitarians and Trinitarians being elevated to the level of a salvific issue, causing division within the faith.

You’ve conducted yourself admirably in addressing these complex topics and engaging with your opponents thoughtfully. @Pancho Frijoles

For example-

Engagement with Jewish Exegesis
Origen believed that Jewish interpretations could illuminate the Scriptures, as the Jews were custodians of the Hebrew Bible. In his works, particularly the Hexapla and his commentaries on various books of the Bible, he frequently consulted the Hebrew text and Jewish translations, such as those by Aquila, Symmachus, and Theodotion. This reflects his belief that the Hebrew Scriptures are foundational for Christian theology.

Example from Commentary on Matthew:
Origen often references Jewish interpretations to better understand difficult passages. For instance, in his exegesis of Matthew, he compares the Hebrew Scriptures with the Septuagint and engages with Jewish traditions to clarify prophetic meanings.

2. The Hexapla: A Testament to Origen’s Respect for Jewish Texts
Origen’s Hexapla was a massive scholarly project that placed the Hebrew Scriptures alongside their Greek translations in parallel columns. This monumental work demonstrates Origen’s commitment to understanding the Scriptures as thoroughly as possible, including through the lens of Jewish textual traditions.

Significance:
The Hexapla indicates that Origen valued the Hebrew text and Jewish interpretations, seeing them as essential to uncovering the original meaning of the Scriptures. While he did not advocate turning to Jews for ultimate theological truth, he recognized their role as custodians of the sacred texts.

3. Critique of Jewish Interpretations
While Origen respected Jewish scholarship, he also critiqued what he saw as their failure to recognize Jesus as the Messiah. In his apologetic work Contra Celsum, he defends Christianity against the claims of the pagan philosopher Celsus and addresses Jewish criticisms of Christian beliefs. Origen argues that the Jews misinterpret their own Scriptures by rejecting Christ, whom he believed fulfilled the prophecies.

Example from Contra Celsum (Book 1, Chapter 49):
Origen acknowledges the Jewish claim to the Scriptures but contends that Christians have the correct interpretation because they understand the messianic prophecies as pointing to Jesus.

4. Origen’s View on the Role of Jews
Origen saw the Jewish people as important in God’s plan but believed their role as the primary witnesses to God’s revelation was superseded by Christ and the Church. He viewed the Church as the rightful heir to the promises made to Israel, interpreting the Old Testament in a Christocentric way.

Respect for Jewish Custodianship:
Origen did not dismiss the value of Jewish traditions and their deep familiarity with the Hebrew Scriptures. Instead, he used their insights as a foundation while asserting that the full truth is found in Christ.

Spiritual Interpretation:
Origen was a proponent of allegorical and spiritual readings of Scripture. While he appreciated the Jewish literal interpretations, he often critiqued them for failing to perceive the deeper, spiritual meanings that he believed pointed to Christ.

5. Key Quotes Reflecting His Stance
Origin makes statement that acknowledge the importance of Jewish Scriptures and traditions in understanding Christian faith:

On the Importance of Jewish Scriptures:
“The Church has received through the succession of the prophets and the apostles the Law and the Prophets, which were given to the Jews, and she uses them as a witness for the teaching of Jesus.” (De Principiis, Book 4)

On Misunderstandings by Jews:
“They [the Jews] read the prophecies, but their eyes are veiled, so that they do not see what they mean.” (Contra Celsum, Book 2, Chapter 6)

While Christian thinkers often engaged with Jewish traditions to better understand the Hebrew Scriptures, their ultimate aim was to demonstrate how those Scriptures pointed to Christ. Similarly, Jewish writings of that time typically focused on their own interpretations of the Torah and did not support Christian theological claims.

Shalom.

J.
 
There is a significant amount of misinformation and disinformation circulating online, and writings from ancient rabbis about Jesus-let alone the Trinity-are extremely limited. It’s disheartening to see the ongoing debate between Unitarians and Trinitarians being elevated to the level of a salvific issue, causing division within the faith.

You’ve conducted yourself admirably in addressing these complex topics and engaging with your opponents thoughtfully. @Pancho Frijoles
While I agree with most of what you write, I have to strongly disagree here

There is no common faith between the Unitarians and the Trinitarians nor can there be.
 
While I agree with most of what you write, I have to strongly disagree here

There is no common faith between the Unitarians and the Trinitarians nor can there be.
I believe I can find common ground with my Unitarian brothers and sisters since YHVH knows them that are His @TomL.
A desire for unity in the Christian community, despite theological differences.

Why?

2Ti 2:19 Al kol panim (nevertheless), the solid yesod of Hashem stands firm and zicher (certain), having this seal: V'YODA' Hashem ES ASHER LO ("Hashem KNOWS THE ONES WHO ARE HIS" BAMIDBAR 16:5); and let everyone who names the name of Hashem depart from avel (iniquity, gross injustice).

1 Cor. 13.




Common Ground
Belief in One God: Both Unitarians and Trinitarians affirm that there is only one God. Unitarians reject polytheism, and Trinitarians reject the notion of multiple gods. They both agree on the foundational belief of monotheism, even though they interpret it differently.

The Centrality of Jesus Christ: Both groups regard Jesus Christ as central to their faith. For Unitarians, Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God, and an important figure in salvation. For Trinitarians, Jesus is also central, though viewed as God incarnate. Both groups agree on the significance of Jesus in redemption and salvation.

The Role of the Holy Scriptures: Both groups uphold the Bible as the authoritative scripture. While they interpret certain passages differently, both Unitarians and Trinitarians believe the Bible to be divinely inspired and central to their faith.

The Importance of Salvation: Both Unitarians and Trinitarians agree on the necessity of salvation through Jesus Christ. They both believe in the importance of faith in Christ and a relationship with God as key to salvation, though the mechanisms and understanding of Christ's nature and role may differ.

Moral and Ethical Teachings: Both traditions affirm the moral teachings of Jesus, such as loving one's neighbor, forgiveness, and living a righteous life. The ethical teachings of Jesus are central to both worldviews, even if they diverge on the theological aspects of who Jesus is.

Key Differences
Nature of God:

Unitarians believe that God is a singular, indivisible being, and that Jesus is a unique, divinely chosen human, but not God Himself. In their view, Jesus was the Son of God, but not co-eternal or consubstantial with the Father.
Trinitarians believe in the Triune God—Father, Son, and Holy Spirit—three persons in one essence. They assert that Jesus is fully God and fully man, and that He is co-eternal with the Father.
Jesus Christ's Divinity:

Unitarians regard Jesus as the Son of God, a special prophet and the anointed Messiah, but not divine in the same sense as God the Father.
Trinitarians believe that Jesus is the eternally begotten Son of the Father, and fully God as well as fully human. Jesus' divinity is central to the doctrine of the Trinity.
Holy Spirit:

Unitarians generally view the Holy Spirit as God’s power or presence in the world, but not as a distinct person of the Godhead.

Trinitarians view the Holy Spirit as the third person of the Trinity, fully divine, equal in essence to the Father and the Son, and playing an active role in believers' lives, such as in regeneration, sanctification, and empowerment for Christian living.
Salvation and Christ's Atonement:

Unitarians tend to reject the doctrine of atonement in the traditional Christian sense, which includes the idea that Jesus' death was necessary for the forgiveness of sins. They may see Jesus' life and teachings as an example for salvation, focusing more on moral transformation.

Trinitarians believe in atonement through Christ's death—the idea that Jesus' sacrificial death was necessary to reconcile humanity with God and to atone for sin.

Areas of Dialogue
While the differences on the nature of God and Christ’s divinity are significant, there are areas where Unitarians and Trinitarians can find common ground in terms of shared moral and ethical values, such as:

The importance of following Christ’s teachings on love, compassion, and service to others.
A shared commitment to evangelism and spreading the message of Jesus Christ.
A desire for unity in the Christian community, despite theological differences.

I look for the fruit of the Spirit in the lives of believers, including my own. Without fruit, there is no root, and it's void of what truly matters. Very rarely is the Holy Spirit and effectual prayers discussed on this forum.


J.
 
I believe I can find common ground with my Unitarian brothers and sisters since YHVH knows them that are His @TomL.
A desire for unity in the Christian community, despite theological differences.

You can believe what you like

But there is not a common faith between Unitarians and trinitarians, never was and never will be.

This is historical fact

Arians who held Christ was a created being but god and are considered a cult are closer to Christianity than Unitarians who hold Christ was nothing more than a man who had no previous existence

Such a position was absent from any thought within historicChristianityy

There is no evidence that they are his

Failing to honor the son, they fail to honor the father and have no access to him

John 14:6 (LEB) — 6 Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.
 
Back
Top Bottom