I like Sye but the logic is a little cheesy.
It comes across as arrogant to use the problem of justified belief to insert your presupposition.
Christ and the apostles did not use logical sophistry, they just declared people's sin.
And his opening statement is exactly what I based my paper upon. All Theology must begin with who God is, His nature and character which is Immutable. He hooked my right off the start and now I will listen to the rest of the video to see where he goes with his opening statement and premise.
Explain. Ground level can seem a little basic to those who are used to Frame, Bahnsen, or Van Til...but it's functional.
I see it as the pride of intellect that we want to figure out how to prove God with logic.
Instead humbling ourselves as children and being dependent.
Revelation alone brings truth, and it offends us that effort and cleverness and logic just can't get to it.
Everyone in the Bible had a direct experience of and with God, and spoke from that—and Scripture promises us that same revelation.
However, Sye can be funny and make a good point once in awhile.
This is my favorite debate of his: