Discussion of Habakkuk

Administrator

Administrator
Staff member
The Book of
HABAKKUK

Author: Habakkuk
Date: About 600 B.C.
Theme: The Just Shall Live by Faith
Key Words: Faith, Why?, Woe

Author. The name “Habakkuk” means “Embrace,” either signifying that he was “embraced by God” and thus strengthened by Him for his difficult task, or “embracing others” and so encouraging them in time of national crisis. The musical notation in 3:19 may indicate that Habakkuk was qualified to lead in temple worship as a member of the Levitical family. The prophet is imbued with a sense of justice, which will not let him ignore the rampant unrighteousness around him. He has also learned the necessity of bringing the major questions of life to the One who created and redeems life.

Background and Date. Habakkuk lived during one of Judah’s most critical periods. His country had fallen from the heights of Josiah’s reforms to the depths of violent treatment of its citizens, oppressive measures against the poor, and collapse of the legal system. The world around Judah was at war, with Babylonia rising to ascendancy over Assyria and Egypt. The threat of invasion from the north added to Judah’s internal turmoil. Habakkuk probably wrote during the interval between the fall of Nineveh in 612 B.C. and the fall of Jerusalem in 586 B.C.

Content. The Book of Habakkuk gives the account of a spiritual journey, telling of one man’s pilgrimage from doubt to worship. The difference between the beginning of the book (1:1–4) and the end of the book (3:17–19) is striking.

In the first four verses Habakkuk is overwhelmed by the circumstances all about him. He can think of nothing except the iniquity and violence he sees among his people. Although Habakkuk addresses God (1:2), he believes God has removed Himself from the earthly scene: His words are forgotten; His hand is not manifest; God is nowhere to be found. Men are in control, and evil men at that. And they act just as one would expect men to act without God’s restraint. These words and phrases describe the scene: “iniquity ... trouble ... plundering ... violence ... strife ... contention ... law is powerless ... justice never goes forth ... wicked surround the righteous ... perverse judgment proceeds.”

How different is the scene in the last three verses of the book (3:17–19)! All has changed. The prophet is no longer controlled by or even anxious over his circumstances, for his sights have been raised. Temporal affairs no longer fill his thoughts, but his thoughts are on things above. Instead of being ruled by worldly considerations, Habakkuk has fixed his hopes on God, for he realizes that God does take an interest in His creatures. He is the Source of the prophet’s strength and joy. Habakkuk has discovered that he is made for higher ground: “He will make me walk on my high hills” (3:19). The words in the last paragraph contrast sharply with those in the first: “rejoice in the LORD ... joy in the God of my salvation ... God is my strength ... feet like deer’s feet ... walk on my high hills” (3:18, 19). So Habakkuk has gone from complaining to confidence, from doubt to trust, from man to God, from the valley to the high hills.

If the heart of the gospel is change and transformation, the Book of Habakkuk demonstrates evangelical renewal. At the center of the change and at the center of the book stands this clear credo of faith: “The just shall live by his faith” (2:4). For the prophet, the promise is for physical protection in time of great upheaval and war. When the predicted invasion by foreign armies becomes a reality, that righteous remnant whose God is the Lord, whose trust and dependence is in Him, will be delivered and they will live. For New Testament writers, such as Paul and the author of Hebrews, this statement of confident faith becomes demonstration of the power of the gospel to give assurance of eternal salvation. For Martin Luther, Habakkuk’s theme becomes the watchword of the Reformation.

Personal Application. Habakkuk reminds us that the question “Why?” can, should, and must be asked. His circumstances demanded that he ask God about the apparent reign of unrighteousness around him. Because he believed in God, he believed that God had an answer to his problem. His questions demonstrated the presence of faith, not the lack of it. For an atheist the question “Why?” has no meaning; for a believer the question “Why?” finds its ultimate answer in God.
Paul the apostle takes the statement of Habakkuk 2:4 and makes it the heart of the gospel. The righteousness of God is attained only through faith, so that the right way to live is to trust. Habakkuk calls all believers in all times to trust God, to be faithful to Him, and so to find life as God means it to be lived.

The final verses of this prophecy teach that it is possible to rise above circumstances, and even to rejoice in them, by focusing on God who stands above all. Habakkuk does not deny his problems, nor does he treat them lightly; instead, he finds God sufficient in the midst of his troubles.

Christ Revealed. The terms used by Habakkuk in 3:13 join the idea of salvation with the Lord’s Anointed. The Hebrew roots of these words reflect the two names of our Lord: Jesus, meaning “Salvation,” and Christ, meaning “the Anointed One.” The context here is God’s great power manifested in behalf of His people through a Davidic King to bring them deliverance from their enemies. The Messiah came in the fullness of time (2:3; Gal. 4:4), was given the name “Jesus” as a prenatal prophecy of His ministry (Matt. 1:21), and was born “in the city of David a Savior, who is Christ the Lord” (Luke 2:11).

As Habakkuk waits for the answer to his questions, God grants him the gift of a truth that satisfies his unspoken longings as well as provides the solution to his present situation: “The just shall live by his faith” (2:4). The apostle Paul sees this statement of Habakkuk as the foundation stone of the gospel of Christ (Rom. 1:16, 17). Christ is the answer to human needs, including cleansing from sin, relationship with God, and hope for the future.

The Holy Spirit at Work. Though no direct references to the Holy Spirit are found in Habakkuk, there are intimations of His life working in the prophet. As Habakkuk surveys the ruin brought about by the invading armies, he nevertheless expresses an abiding joy that even disaster on so large a scale cannot steal from him, reminding us that “the fruit of the Spirit is ... joy” (Gal. 5:22).
Also, in Galatians, Paul links the most famous verse from Habakkuk with the reception of the promised Holy Spirit through faith (2:4; Gal. 3:11–14). The righteous person lives by his faith in all aspects of his life, including entering into the life of the Spirit.


Jack W. Hayford, Spirit Filled Life Study Bible
 
When Habakkuk 2:4 says that the righteous shall live by faith, does the context support that he is speaking about a way of living that is an alternative to living in obedience to God's law, or is he speaking about a way of living that is an alternative to those who are not living in obedient to God's law?
 
I go with they have faith to live in God's obedience.

Habakkuk 2:4 emphasizes the importance of faith in the face of adversity. The verse contrasts the proud and the righteous, stating that the proud will not find favor with God, while the righteous will live by faith. This principle is rooted in the belief that true righteousness is not about actions but about the deep-rooted faith that propels those actions. The verse serves as a reminder to rely on God's truth, promises, and guidance to navigate life's challenges and uncertainties. It encourages individuals to trust in God's plan even when they cannot see the whole picture, fostering a life of dependence on God. AI
The context helps us to understand God’s intent in this passage. The whole verse reads, “Behold, his soul is puffed up; it is not upright within him, but the righteous shall live by his faith.” “His soul” is a symbolic reference to Babylonia. This nation had become proud or “puffed up.” As a result, they were unrighteous and facing God’s judgment. In contrast, the righteous (or the “just”) would live by faith in God. By contrast, the righteous are humble in God’s eyes and will never face God’s judgment.

Habakkuk 2:4: What Does It Really Mean?

While Habakkuk 2:4 was unequivocally clear to St. Paul as he wrote to the Romans and the Galatians (Rom 3:28; 5:1; Gal 2:16; 3:11, 24; see, by contrast, Jas 2:24), the Hebrew of the text leaves some confusion as to its original intent. The first half of the verse, “Look at the proud!” uses a difficult word for “proud”—indeed a hapax legomenon (single occurrence in the Hebrew Bible)—and the verse is imbalanced, providing no corresponding fate for the “proud” to the one assigned to the righteous, that they would live (by faith). For all of that, it seems most likely, given the passage that follows in 2:5–20, that the “proud” refers to Babylon, the “righteous” to Judah, and that the fate of the proud would be to fall (in time).

Robert A. Kugler An Introduction to the Bible
 
Habakkuk gets quoted in at least 4 instances in the NT. These are Gal 3:11, Rom 1:17, Heb 10:36-38, and Acts 10:40-41. These suggest either a direct fulfillment/application or analogical relevance of Habakkuk to the first century. Further, despite a tendency of commentaries to apply Hab 2 to Babylon, the text appears to describe the wicked from among the people of Israel. In the English of the LXX for 2:5 we have the scorner contrasted with the righteous of v4. (Note it is a challenge to resolve everything in Habakkuk with various reasons to prefer the LXX while still facing problems using that. For example, Moo shares Fitzmyer's list of about six variant wording of Hab 2:4. )

Another detail showing the people of Israel in focus in the mention of treatment of neighbors in 2:15. Hardly would the treatment of neighbors in the Chaldean/Babylon communities be of concern to the prophet. Other details too can be applied to the tribes of Israel. The additional problem simply would be that the Chaldeans got sufficient mention in Habakkuk 1 and would not need to be restated in chapter 2. Instead, there would be the indication in Habakkuk 2 of the unrighteous behavior found among people of Israel that parallels the wickedness of the Babylonians.

As to the Hab 2:4, the mention of faith can be seen as an attribute of the righteous. The mention of life pertains to the retaining of life -- or staying alive -- in the face of wrath (Hab 3:2). This applies fine in Gal 3:11-12 where those who try to live by the law face the wrath. I also am presenting an argument on Rom 1:17 of Paul introducing Hab 2:4 to show the contrast of the righteous ones remaining alive contrasted with those of wrath introduced in Rom 1:18.
 
Sorry. The passage in Acts is Acts 13:40-41 that refers to Hab 1:5-6. Paul is shown there as sharing the coming fulfillment of the surprising loss of the temple and city. Jerusalem was thought to be impenetrable. But infighting within the city resulted in destruction of the food stores. There were other horrible acts happening in the city in AD 66-70 that weakened it from within.
 
As to the Hab 2:4, the mention of faith can be seen as an attribute of the righteous. The mention of life pertains to the retaining of life -- or staying alive -- in the face of wrath (Hab 3:2). This applies fine in Gal 3:11-12 where those who try to live by the law face the wrath. I also am presenting an argument on Rom 1:17 of Paul introducing Hab 2:4 to show the contrast of the righteous ones remaining alive contrasted with those of wrath introduced in Rom 1:18.
Why does it make sense to interpret Galatians 3:11-12 as saying that those who rely on God's instructions face wrath while those who live in complete disobedience to God do not? Does God want our complete disobedience?
 
Why does it make sense to interpret Galatians 3:11-12 as saying that those who rely on God's instructions face wrath while those who live in complete disobedience to God do not? Does God want our complete disobedience?
If you want to try to live in complete disobedience to what Christ has done, you can face the consequence. I know that some people miss the end of the law era even when reading Galatians. I still see it worthwhile to show why the quote to Hab 2:4 has more significance than just promoting faith over against works of the law. Sorry that my post is not directed toward those who seek to live by the law of Moses. I don't really want this turned into a law-vs-faith discussion again.
 
If you want to try to live in complete disobedience to what Christ has done, you can face the consequence. I know that some people miss the end of the law era even when reading Galatians.
In Matthew 4:15-23, Jesus began his ministry with the Gospel message to repent for the Kingdom of God is at hand, which was a light to the Gentiles, and the Law of Moses was how his audience knew what sin is (Romans 3:20), so repenting from our disobedience to it is a central part of the Gospel o the Kingdom/Grace. Jesus also set a sinless example for us to follow of how to walk in obedience to the Law of Moses and we are told to follow his example (1 Peter 2:21-22) and that those who are in Christ are obligated to walk in the same way that he walked (1 John 2:6). In Titus 2:14, Jesus gave himself to redeem us from all lawlessness and to purify for himself a people of his own possession who are zealous for doing good works, so the way to believe in what Christ has done through his ministry and through the cross is by repenting and becoming zealous for doing good works in obedience to the Law of Moses (Acts 21:20) while the way to reject everything that he has done would be by returning the lawlessness that he gave himself to redeem us from. Paul's problem in Galatians was not with those who were teaching Gentiles how to believe in what Christ has done but with those who were wanting to require Gentiles to obey works of the law in order to become justified.

I still see it worthwhile to show why the quote to Hab 2:4 has more significance than just promoting faith over against works of the law. Sorry that my post is not directed toward those who seek to live by the law of Moses.
The context of Habakkuk 2:4 does not present the righteous living by faith as being a way of living that is an alternative to living in obedience to what God has commanded, but rather the righteous living by faith describes the way that the righteous live in obedience to what God has commanded. In Isaiah 51:7, the righteous are those on whose heart is the Law of Moses, and in 1 John 3:4-7, everyone who is a doer of righteous works in obedience to the Law of Moses is righteous.
 
Back
Top Bottom