MTMattie
Active Member
I checked this thoroughly and do not find any copyright restrictions.
I always read these in their original PDF form which is already on display.
Daniel Nessim
Didache,
History of Messianic Judaism,
Second Temple Judaism and Early Christianity
The Didache is an early Christian Jewish record from the apostolic period and a crucial document in the attempt to understand not only the praxis, but also the theology of nascent Christian Judaism. It's nascent proto-Trinitarianism is surprisingly well developed.
The Lord in the Didache The identity of the Lord (ӭӵӬӳςЈ in the Didache has been a source of disagreement among scholars since its modern rediscovery. Clayton Jefford holds t70t J4sus 8s not “4v4r sp428f820lly 68v4n 0 34s86n0t8on of 38v8n8ty w8t78n t74 t4xt.” 6 Jefford further surmises that t78s m0y 14 p0rt of 0 “2ultur0l s4ns8t8v8ty” 0t work “34s86n43 to off4r t74 squ40m8s7 Christian Jew an opportunity to consider the divine nature of the messiah without risking a denial of the 10s82 J4w8s7 2onf4ss8on t70t ‘t74 Lor3 8s our Go3, t74 Lor3 0lon4’ Ї(4ut :লЈ.” 7
HOWEVER>>> this is what caught my attention
There is merit to this observation, but as I aim to show the Didache is not shy regarding J4sus’ 38v8n8ty. On page 4
I always read these in their original PDF form which is already on display.
Didache and Trinity: Proto-Trinitarianism in an Early Christian Community
The Didache is an early Christian Jewish record from the apostolic period and a crucial document in the attempt to understand not only the praxis, but also the theology of nascent Christian Judaism. It's nascent proto-Trinitarianism is
www.academia.edu
Daniel NessimDidache,
History of Messianic Judaism,
Second Temple Judaism and Early Christianity
The Didache is an early Christian Jewish record from the apostolic period and a crucial document in the attempt to understand not only the praxis, but also the theology of nascent Christian Judaism. It's nascent proto-Trinitarianism is surprisingly well developed.
The Lord in the Didache The identity of the Lord (ӭӵӬӳςЈ in the Didache has been a source of disagreement among scholars since its modern rediscovery. Clayton Jefford holds t70t J4sus 8s not “4v4r sp428f820lly 68v4n 0 34s86n0t8on of 38v8n8ty w8t78n t74 t4xt.” 6 Jefford further surmises that t78s m0y 14 p0rt of 0 “2ultur0l s4ns8t8v8ty” 0t work “34s86n43 to off4r t74 squ40m8s7 Christian Jew an opportunity to consider the divine nature of the messiah without risking a denial of the 10s82 J4w8s7 2onf4ss8on t70t ‘t74 Lor3 8s our Go3, t74 Lor3 0lon4’ Ї(4ut :লЈ.” 7
HOWEVER>>> this is what caught my attention
There is merit to this observation, but as I aim to show the Didache is not shy regarding J4sus’ 38v8n8ty. On page 4
