Didache and Trinity: Proto-Trinitarianism in an Early Christian Community

MTMattie

Well-known member
Far too long to copy here, this is the link


Didache and Trinity: Proto-Trinitarianism in an Early Christian Community

ENJOY, if you are interested in historical points.

The Didache is an early Christian Jewish record from the apostolic period and a crucial document in the attempt to understand not only the praxis, but also the theology of nascent Christian Judaism. It's nascent proto-Trinitarianism is surprisingly well developed.
 
Far too long to copy here, this is the link


Didache and Trinity: Proto-Trinitarianism in an Early Christian Community

ENJOY, if you are interested in historical points.

The Didache is an early Christian Jewish record from the apostolic period and a crucial document in the attempt to understand not only the praxis, but also the theology of nascent Christian Judaism. It's nascent proto-Trinitarianism is surprisingly well developed.
The didache is anti-Trinitarian, just like the Bible. It never calls Jesus God, but rather God's servant.
 
The didache is anti-Trinitarian, just like the Bible. It never calls Jesus God, but rather God's servant.
I thought you would zero in on that.....

But.... also
"Particularly striking is the Didache’s lack of interest in essential tenets of Pauline Christianity. Not only does it affirm Torah observance, but it also makes no mention of the death and resurrection of Jesus, and its Eucharist celebration makes no connection of the meal with the body and blood of Christ. This position suggests alignment of the community with, once again, the Gospel of Matthew and with the anti-Pauline “faith without works is dead” theology of the Epistle of James. The Didache imagines Jesus as the servant of God, not a dying and rising son of God whose eschatological return ushers in a new kingdom."

But before you get all puffed up that the early fathers support your belief..... read this. For they cannot be right in one and wrong in the other......


What does the Didache teach us about the theology and practice of baptism in the ancient church?

Chapter 7 of the Didache addresses the topic of Christian baptism.

In verse 1 of this chapter, we see a connection between baptism and catechesis. Those who were about to receive baptism were first of all instructed in the way of life.

Secondly, we learn that whenever baptism was administered, God was invoked by his triune name: Father, Son and Holy Spirit. The recipient of baptism was being baptized into union and fellowship with the Triune God.

Thirdly, baptism ordinarily would have taken place outdoors in living water, meaning running or flowing water. This was the ordinary setting for Christian baptism, but verse 2 tells us that if such water was unavailable, Christians were free to baptize with other water, preferably cold water.

Next, we see that pouring water on the head three times—which is known as trine baptism—was an acceptable mode of baptism, even though it may not have been the ordinary mode of baptism.


Finally, we see that the rite of baptism was preceded by a short period of fasting. Those who were about to be baptized should fast, and the one who was going to administer baptism should likewise fast, as well as any others in the congregation who were able to do so. This fast ordinarily lasted one to two days.

The Didache does not explain the reason for the pre-baptismal fast, but it was most likely understood as a sign of repentance.

So there we have a brief introduction to what the Didache says about Christian baptism in the ancient church.
 
I was again sent the PDF of this Didache and Trinity: Proto-Trinitarianism in an Early Christian Community.

I am just bringing it up a little in case anyone wants to read it.

Of course, if you are not interested in biblical or Christian history pass on by... but if you are...its kind of neat.


From the pages.... which cannot be copied and pasted as they scramble, badly, are these couple of interesting sentences.
and the spaces are specific words that scramble even worse.

Pg4.

There is merit to this observation but as I am to show the Didache is not shy in regarding Jesus' Divinity

The term _________ and its derivatives occur some 21 times in the Didache. Meanwhile the words God (____) and Father ( _________ as in heavenly Father occur some 12 and 6 times respectively for a total of 18. The vast majority of instances of (___________) [ first space above} in the Didache most naturally lend themselves to the interpretation as the Lord Jesus.
 
My comment is only relative to the evidence itself. There is much conjecture on all sides of this discussion. Relative to "the" Didache.....such only survives in Codex Hierosolymitanus. There are some manuscript fragments that contain some similarities to the 11th century Codex Hierosolymitanus. Nothing more.

It would be nice to have an open discussion on how to judge extant evidence. I would never personally use the "Didache" as meaningful evidence to establish fact.
 
My comment is only relative to the evidence itself. There is much conjecture on all sides of this discussion. Relative to "the" Didache.....such only survives in Codex Hierosolymitanus. There are some manuscript fragments that contain some similarities to the 11th century Codex Hierosolymitanus. Nothing more.

It would be nice to have an open discussion on how to judge extant evidence. I would never personally use the "Didache" as meaningful evidence to establish fact.
Any time I have referred to it I have gotten negative comments.

But this is an interesting read so I posted it now for the 2nd time....
 
Back
Top Bottom