Axe and two 38's

[Weyoun]

It is my belief that one needs to be careful when reading into Scripture. Acts is history and not necessarily for direct commands to be followed.

The audience was Jews

 

[Jaime]

It is my belief that one needs to be careful when reading into Scripture. Acts is history and not necessarily for direct commands to be followed.

The audience was Jews

Isn’t anything in the New Testament about baptism or salvation from history, with the exception of the Book of Revelation, cconcernkng future events? Even Paul was commanded by Ananias to quickly arise and be baptized in Acts 22 to wash away his sins calling upon the Lord. This was AFTER Paul’s face to face encounter with the risen Christ on the road to Damascus. It seems to me Acts is just as relevant as any New Testiment Book, maybe more so. I would like to hear more of your thoughts on this. Thanks!




Revelation.