What do Baptists Believe ?

civic

Well-known member
First Baptist, Second Baptist, American Baptist, Southern Baptist, General Baptist, Independent Baptist, Primitive Baptist – the list goes on and on. Just who are these groups, and where did they all come from? Do they believe the same things or get along with each other? Depending on whom you ask, the Baptist church can be the oldest of all traditions, or a newcomer hanging on the coattails of the Reformation. It can be the standard-bearer of old-time, orthodox doctrine or the breeding ground of heresy. The truth is that the answer depends on whether you are examining a particular group or the fundamental doctrines of that group. Each Baptist group can trace its history to a particular starting point as an organization, but the roots go back to the very beginning of the Christian faith.

Tracking down the origins of the Baptist Church in general is an exercise in ancient church history. From the days of the apostles, there was one Church of Jesus Christ, with a single body of doctrine taught by the apostles. The various local churches preached repentance and confession of sins, along with baptism by immersion as an outward sign of the new life in Christ (Romans 6:3-4). Under the authority of the apostles themselves as to doctrine, each church was independently governed by the leaders God placed in them. There was neither denominational hierarchy, nor distinction of “us/them” within the various churches. In fact, Paul soundly rebuked the Corinthians for such divisions (1 Corinthians 3:1-9). When disputes over sound doctrine arose, the apostles declared God’s teaching based on the words of the Lord and the Old Testament Scriptures. For at least 100 years, this model remained the standard for all churches. Thus, the characteristics that defined the earliest churches are the same that most Baptist churches identify with today.

Starting around A.D. 250, with the intense persecutions under Emperor Decius, a gradual change began to take place as the bishops (pastors) of certain notable churches assumed a hierarchical authority over the churches in their regions (e.g., the church of Rome). While many churches surrendered themselves to this new structure, there was a substantial number of dissenting churches who refused to come under the growing authority of the bishops. These dissenting churches were first called “Puritans” and are known to have had an influence as far as France in the 3rd century. As the organized church gradually adopted new practices and doctrines, the dissenting churches maintained their historical positions. The consistent testimony of the church for its first 400 years was to administer baptism to only those who first made a profession of faith in Christ. Starting in A.D. 401, with the fifth Council of Carthage, the churches under the rule of Rome began teaching and practicing infant baptism. As a result, the separatist churches began re-baptizing those who made professions of faith after having been baptized in the official church. At this time, the Roman Empire encouraged their bishops to actively oppose the dissenting churches, and even passed laws condemning them to death. The re-baptizers became known as Anabaptists, though the churches in various regions of the empire were also known by other names, such as Novatianists, Donatists, Albigenses, and Waldenses.

These Anabaptist congregations grew and prospered throughout the Holy Roman Empire, even though they were almost universally persecuted by the Catholic Church. By the Reformation, Martin Luther’s assistants complained that the Baptists in Bohemia and Moravia were so prevalent, they were like weeds. When John Calvin’s teachings became commonly known, many of the Waldenses united with the reformed church. Menno Simons, the founder of the Mennonites, organized the scattered community of Dutch Baptist churches in 1536. From this point on, the various Anabaptist churches gradually lost their ancient names and assumed the name “Baptist,” though they retained their historic independence and self-rule. The first English Baptist church was founded in 1612 by Thomas Helwys and John Murton, who had come under the influence of the Dutch Puritans in Amsterdam. This group became known as General Baptists, for their Arminian belief in general atonement. Another English Baptist church was formed after a schism from Henry Jacob’s congregation in London in 1633. This group held a Calvinistic theology of particular atonement and became the main influence in the English Particular Baptist movement.

The first Baptist church in America was founded by Roger Williams in 1638. During the colonial and federal periods, the Baptist churches prospered and spread, while being only loosely organized as a fellowship. The first clear national organization was the General Missionary Convention of the Baptist Denomination in 1814. This was called by Luther Rice to address the need of raising funds and workers to carry out the missionary mandate in foreign countries. Some Baptist churches resisted this missionary emphasis and became known as Primitive Baptists. When the Civil War broke out, the Baptists in the North and the South broke their fellowship and formed separate denominations. Today, there are at least 65 different Baptist associations or denominations in the United States. Some retain a strict autonomy for the local church, while others have more of a denominational structure. Some have very conservative views of doctrine and practice, while others are quite progressive and liberal. Even within some groups there is a wide divergence of practice, so it is hard to pin down exactly what they believe.

The Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) is a denomination comprised of over 16 million members in over 42,000 churches in the United States. Individual church membership is typically a matter of accepting Jesus Christ as personal Savior and submitting to believer’s baptism by immersion. The SBC is considered to be an evangelistic, mission-minded church with a generally conservative doctrine which focuses on the fact that Jesus died for our sin, was buried, and then rose from the grave and ascended to heaven. Unlike some other denominations, the churches in the SBC generally identify themselves as independent, autonomous congregations which have voluntarily joined together for mutual support.

The American Baptist Church, USA, has roughly 1.3 million members and was formerly known as the Northern Baptist Convention, which formed after the split with the Southern Baptists. A key distinctive of the American Baptists is the freedom of the individual churches to have differing beliefs. The denomination’s unity is based on functional cooperation rather than doctrinal agreement. This practice led to a split in 1932, which resulted in the formation of the General Association of Regular Baptist Churches (GARBC). The GARBC holds a conservative doctrine and emphasizes evangelism and missionary work.

The name “Baptist” has come to mean many things to many people, and so can sometimes cause confusion. As with any other church, the name above the door isn’t as important as what is taught within. As we examine any church, we would do well to follow the example of the Berean believers in Acts 17:11, who “searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so” (KJV).got?

hope this helps !!!
 
Last edited:
I didn't know a thing about Baptists till I read the above post by Civic. I don't know much trigonometry either. I've also forgotten all the French that I took In high school. So I did a little research on my own. And I found this Why I Am a Baptist by Clarence Larkin.

ORIGIN OF THE BAPTISTS


Almost all the Anti-papist denominations date, either directly or indirectly, from the Reformation of the sixteenth century. The Protestant Episcopal, Lutheran, and Presbyterian Churches, came from the Roman Catholic Church, and the Methodist Episcopal Church came from the Protestant Episcopal Church.

The Baptists, however, do not date from the Reformation. Though Anti-papists, they are not, in the technical and historical sense of the word, “Protestants,” though they have ever protested, and do now protest, against the heresies and abominations of the Romish Church.
Just before his ascension, Jesus said to his disciples:

All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth. Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Ghost. Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you; and, lo, I am with you always, even unto the end of the world. Amen. Matt 28:18–20: and Mark adds. He that believeth and is baptized, shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned. Mark 16:16.

The requirements of this Divine Commission, are—

1. To preach the gospel to all nations.
2. To baptize those who believe.
3. To teach those who believe to observe all things whatsoever Christ commanded.

This the apostles did. That the churches they founded were believed to be composed of regenerated persons, is evident from the fact that they addressed or referred to them as “believers,” “saints,” “quickened,” “the faithful,” “the redeemed,” “the sanctified,” “the saved,” etc. The apostolic churches were also independent bodies; that is, separate from the State and from each other, and self governed. They are spoken of individually as, “the church at Jerusalem,” “the church at Antioch,” “the church at Smyrna.” They are spoken of collectively as, “the churches,” “the churches of Macedonia,” “the churches of Asia,” “all the churches.”

They are represented as electing their own officers, admitting, expelling, and restoring members, and acting as distinct, independent bodies.
There is a remarkable similarity between the apostolic churches and the Baptist churches of today, in their modes and forms of worship.
The apostolic churches were distinguished for the plainness and simplicity of their worship. “They had no magnificent cathedrals, gorgeously arrayed priesthood, no prescribed ritual, no splendid religious shows, no pomp of music, no parade of images and paintings.”

Quietly, and unostentatiously, they met in some “upper room,” or other humble sanctuary, to sing, to pray, to read and expound the Scriptures, and to exhort one another to faithfulness in the Christian life.
 
There is quite a difference in non calvinist and calvinist Baptist's.

Belief leading to salvation...non calvinist

Salvation before belief .. calvinist.

There is also a big difference between baptists who say the body of Christ is purely local. No universal body... And those who have a body of Christ of all redeemed.

Water baptism for a local only guy like me is what is in 1 co 12:13

But for the universal church guy...that is not water baptism but Holy Spirit baptism.

The other big difference is Baptist's that have no human founder...and Baptist's that have a human founder from the Reformation.
 
There is quite a difference in non calvinist and calvinist Baptist's.

Belief leading to salvation...non calvinist

Salvation before belief .. calvinist.

There is also a big difference between baptists who say the body of Christ is purely local. No universal body... And those who have a body of Christ of all redeemed.

Water baptism for a local only guy like me is what is in 1 co 12:13

But for the universal church guy...that is not water baptism but Holy Spirit baptism.

The other big difference is Baptist's that have no human founder...and Baptist's that have a human founder from the Reformation.
Thanks for pointing out those differences. Up not up on all the differences within the Baptist umbrella.
 
The Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) is a denomination
Technically, the SBC is not a denomination. The central authority (the Convention) exerts ZERO control over any member church. It is more like “Sam’s Club” … an organization that a church may apply to for membership to purchase services that they cannot do locally [like support a seminary, or foreign missions]. Each LOCAL CHURCH owns its own building (or rents), has its own budget, is incorporated as a legal entity independent of the SBC and governs itself. Each church chooses how much money it wishes to contribute to the SBC and for which projects (Missions, Seminaries, Publications, etc.).

Thus, the SBC has none of the characteristics of a denomination like the PCUSA or LCMS. The only POWER that the SBC has is to expel a member church for gross doctrinal error (like denying the virgin birth) in which case, that church would not be permitted to contribute to SBC projects (like Missions) or attend the Convention where member churches get to talk about issues.
 
Baptist churches are defined by historic Baptist Distinctives:

Baptist Distinctives (by Dr. Mark Terry)

Mid-America Baptist Seminary’s Articles of Belief contains an article on Baptist distinctives that states: “We are Baptists because we believe that Baptists stand for distinctive truths to which other denominations do not adhere. We believe that we cannot compromise these truths without being disloyal to our Lord and to His Word. We do seek to cooperate with all others who are committed to Jesus Christ as Lord.” What are those distinctive doctrines?

The Bible

Article 1 in the 2000 Statement of Faith and Message is The Holy Scriptures. The article reads thus:
The Holy Bible was written by men divinely inspired and is God’s revelation of Himself to man. It is a perfect treasure of divine instruction. It has

God for its author, salvation for its end, and truth, without any mixture of error, for its matter. Therefore, all Scripture is totally true and trustworthy. It reveals the principles by which God judges us, and therefore is, and will remain to the end of the world, the true center of Christian union, and the supreme standard by which all human conduct, creeds, and religious opinions should be tried. All Scripture is a testimony to Christ, who is Himself the focus of divine revelation.
The founders of Mid-America Baptist Seminary adopted Articles of Belief and an additional position paper on the Scriptures. The position paper asserts these important points:

  1. God is the ultimate author of the Bible. Because God is the author, the Bible is authoritative. It is the words of God for mankind.
  2. God inspired the Bible. God used human writers, but He inspired them to write “exactly what God intended to be said.” For this reason, the Bible is infallible. That means the Bible does not contain mistakes.
  3. The Bible is inerrant. That means the Bible does not contain errors of any type.
  4. The Bible is the sufficient guide for the individual Christian’s belief and behavior.
More than one Baptist preacher has used a four-point alliterated outline to present the doctrine of the Bible: The Bible is inspired, infallible, inerrant, and irresistible. Indeed, King David wrote that God’s Word is irresistible three thousand years ago: “More to be desired are they than gold, Yea, than much fine gold; Sweeter also than honey and the honeycomb” (Ps 19:10, NKJV).

The Priesthood of All Believers

The New Testament teaches this doctrine in 1 Peter 2:9—“But you are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, His own special people, that you may proclaim the praises of Him who called you out of darkness into His marvelous light” (NKJV). The Criswell Study Bible lists four truths about this doctrine:

  1. Every believer has direct and immediate access to God the Father through Jesus Christ.
  2. The believer’s access to God is made possible by Jesus Christ’s death on the cross.
  3. Believers have the privilege and responsibility to intercede for each other in prayer.
  4. Christians serve as priests of the New Covenant, representing God to the people by witnessing and teaching.
Individual Soul Liberty

The doctrine of soul liberty, or soul competency, is related to the priesthood of the believer. In fact, the two are inseparably joined. Norman Cox explains this doctrine as follows:

The Bible positively affirms that God in creation invested man with the privilege, ability, and responsibility of choice. He is competent to obey or disobey God. Man can adore or scorn the Creator. God has given every man the right of spiritual self-determination. He is free to choose, but he is bound by the consequence of his choice. By his right of choice man is divinely clothed with the dignity God has given him. Each individual possesses it as a gift for which he is responsible…According to the Scriptures, each one, within the privileges of the gospel, is competent to seek and find salvation in Christ, apart from the authority of church, pope, prelate, or sacrament.
The Autonomy of the Local Church

The official website of the SBC (SBC.net) has posted a statement on local church autonomy:
We recognize that in the New Testament there was no centralized ecclesiastical authority over the churches that forced the churches into any for of compliance. There was encouragement, exhortation, and admonition, but there was never enforcement. We strongly adhere that principle. Jesus Christ is the head of the local church—we are not. Each church is responsible before God for the policies it sets and decisions it makes.

In practice, this means the SBC cannot dictate to the local churches. The SBC does not rule the churches; rather, the churches rule the SBC. The SBC can recommend to the churches, but the individual churches will decide for themselves what to do. For example, the SBC Executive Committee recommends that each church give 10 percent of its budget to the Cooperative Program, but many churches do not give that much. Autonomy also applies to the various levels of Baptist organization: local associations of churches, state Baptist conventions, and the national Southern Baptist Convention. These entities are autonomous and cannot dictate to each other. Each of these levels is composed of Southern Baptist churches that voluntarily join them. The member churches send messengers to the annual meetings of all three to vote on budgets, motions, and resolutions.

Regenerate Church Membership

The distinctive of regenerate church membership holds that only born-again people should be accepted as members. Norman Cox explains this: “The New Testament clearly shows who should constitute the membership of a local church. It should be composed only of regenerated, baptized believers.” Why does Cox write so definitively? Acts 2 describes the first church in Jerusalem. Notice Acts :40-41—“And with many other words he (Peter) testified and exhorted them saying, ‘Be saved from this perverse generation.’ Then those who gladly received his word were baptized; and that day about three thousand souls were added to them” (NKJV). Acts 2:47 reiterates the truth—“And the Lord added to the church daily those who were being saved” (NKJV).

These verses reveal the practice of the New Testament church. People heard the proclamation of the gospel and trusted in Christ for salvation. After they expressed their faith, the church baptized them into the fellowship of believers. The baptized believers diligently learned the doctrines taught by the apostles. They also joined in fellowship, corporate prayer, and observance of the Lord’s Supper (Acts 2:42).

Many Protestant denominations practice infant baptism. Baptists reject this practice absolutely. One would search in vain for any reference or mention of infant baptism in the New Testament. In the New Testament accounts all those who received baptism expressed faith in Christ as a prerequisite for baptism. The Ethiopian eunuch serves as a prime example. Luke recounts his salvation and baptism in Acts 8:36-38—“Now as they went down the road, they came to some water. And the eunuch said, ‘See, here is water. What hinders me from being baptized?’ Then Philip said, ‘If you believe with all your heart, you may.’ And he answered and said, ‘I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.’ So he commanded the chariot to stand still. And both Philip and the eunuch went down into the water, and he baptized him” (NKJV).

The Ordinances of the Church

The article in the 2000 Statement on The Ordinances of the Church reads thus:

Christian baptism is the immersion of a believer in water in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. It is an act of obedience symbolizing the believer’s faith in a crucified, buried, and risen Savior, the believer’s death to sin, the burial of the old life, and the resurrection to walk in newness of life in Christ Jesus. It is a testimony to his faith in the final resurrection of the dead. Being a church ordinance, it is prerequisite to the privileges of church membership and to the Lord’s Supper.
The Lord’s Supper is a symbolic act of obedience whereby members of the church, through partaking of the bread and the fruit of the vine, memorialize the death of the Redeemer and anticipate His second coming.

Southern Baptists insist that a correct baptism requires the correct candidate, the correct meaning, and the correct mode. The correct candidate is a person who has professed faith in Jesus Christ. The correct meaning is that baptism does not save a person; rather, baptism demonstrates the obedience of the new believer. Baptism is an “acted testimony” because through baptism the candidate testifies to belief in the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ. Besides being a testimony about Christ, through baptism the candidate testifies that he or she has died to self, been buried with Christ, and is now risen to walk in new life in Christ. Baptists insist on the correct mode of baptism—baptism by immersion. Baptists believe in baptism by immersion for two main reasons. First, the Greek word for baptism is baptizo, which “literally means to put or go under water.” Second, immersion is clearly the mode of baptism employed by the New Testament church.

Separation of Church and State

Baptists have always held strongly for the separation of church and state. The article in the 2000 Statement on separation reflects this:

God alone is Lord of the conscience, and He has left it free from the doctrines and commandments of men which are contrary to His Word or not contained in it. Church and state should be separate. The state owes to every church protection and full freedom in the pursuit of its spiritual ends. In providing for such freedom no ecclesiastical group or denomination should be favored by the state more than others. Civil government being ordained of God, it is the duty of Christians to render loyal obedience thereto in all things not contrary to the revealed will of God. The church should not resort to the civil power to carry on its work. The gospel of Christ contemplates spiritual means alone for the pursuit of its ends. The state has no right to impose penalties for religious opinions of any kind. The state has no right to impose taxes for the support of any form of religion. A free church in a free state is the Christian ideal, and this implies the right of free and unhindered access to God on the part of all men, and the right to form and propagate opinions in the sphere of religion without interference by the civil power.
Baptists have consistently objected to any type of state church, like the Church of England. Also, Baptists have objected to government interference in church matters. Baptists demonstrate strong feelings about the separation of church and state for good reasons. Our spiritual ancestors, the Anabaptists, and English Separatists, suffered much persecution at the hands of state churches in Europe. Even in colonial America, Baptists experienced persecution in Virginia, where the Church of England was the “state church.” Government authorities in Virginia refused to grant Baptist pastors a license to preach. When the pastors preached anyway, they were arrested. For example, James Ireland was arrested in Culpepper County in November 1769 and held in jail without trial until April 1770, when a friendly attorney secured his release.

Virginia Baptists, especially John Leland, lobbied James Madison for his support of separation of church and state. With Leland’s support James Madison was elected to the Constitutional Convention in 1787. Madison repaid the support of Leland and the Baptists of Virginia by introducing the first amendment to the Constitution of the United States: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” It is often said that Baptists support a free church in a free state.
 
Last edited:
I should state that while I do agree with “Individual Soul Liberty”, I would not describe it quite as Norman Cox does. I suspect that Norman is a General Baptist and, therefore, logically applies it to SOTERIOLOGY as well, while I am a Particular Baptist and would apply it to “working out your salvation with fear and trembling” (the stuff that comes after Justification).

In either case, the essence remains that EVERY SOUL answers to GOD and not to any Person or Institution. In practice, this means that people have a right to stand their ground on their BIBLICAL beliefs without any authority (like a Pastor or a Pope or a Denomination) demanding that you believe what they believe. For the Baptist Churches that I have attended, that means that General Baptists and Particular Baptists worship together in the same church and simply disagree on the “exegesis” of particular verses. Each of us will answer to Jesus for OUR conscience. (“Who am I to judge the servant of another”).
 
The Southern Baptist Church I grew up in didn’t recite creeds. I didn’t even know that there were any creeds until I was surprised to hear about them one day at a Bible Study. It was a surreal experience for me. It was my introduction to Church history. Little did I know then about where that would take me.

My preacher died a few years ago. Just before he died, I co-officiated a funeral service with him (that was awkward; with him being a trinitarian, me being a Jewish monotheist, and the service being for my paternal grandmother.) We barely spoke to one another - his choice, not mine - but I deeply regret that I missed my last opportunity to thank him for opening the door to Church history for me. I’ll always be grateful for it. (RIP, Brother Stewart.)

P.S.

Billy Graham delivered a sermon that I don’t recall well. The title of the sermon is “Time Is Short”. What echoes in my mind is is his repetition of the admonition, “Do it now.” Powerful message. Here’s a snippet of it. It’s well worth four and a half minutes of your precious time.


Don’t put off thanking someone, as I did, only to find to your regret that the moment has passed in this present evil age.

I was fortunate with my grandmother. I sent her a card which she received and read a couple of days before she died. I reminded her of many times we had together that stand out in my memory. My father told me later how much pleasure that card brought her.

“Do it now.”

I hope that, by remembering those three small words, it will make a huge difference in your life.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom