The book below argues that the text of the Quran was substantially (not wholly) derived from Syriac Christian Liturgy & Homilies (Saint Ephraim of Syria, for example) and it argues that many "obscure" portions become clear when they are back-translated and interpreted as Syriacisms.
What is the implications of all this?
1. The truth of Christianity overwhelms the Quran.
2. The Quran is text-modified much like the Masoretic Text.
3. The Quran was a conniving attempt by Muslims to "improve on" Christianity as a spiritual basis to build their empires on.
4. Muhammed's demonic-possesed episodes were embellished as prophetic utterances.
5. Mecca was just a desert town of total insignificance, later embellished as the center of the world by Muslims.
The Syro-Aramaic Reading of the Koran - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
What is the implications of all this?
1. The truth of Christianity overwhelms the Quran.
2. The Quran is text-modified much like the Masoretic Text.
3. The Quran was a conniving attempt by Muslims to "improve on" Christianity as a spiritual basis to build their empires on.
4. Muhammed's demonic-possesed episodes were embellished as prophetic utterances.
5. Mecca was just a desert town of total insignificance, later embellished as the center of the world by Muslims.
Last edited: